http://maudsleyparents.org/youngadults.html
Just had to introduce this for the sake of healthy debate. The above link is a site which talks about the Maudsley Family Based Treatment as a way of treating eating disorders. It is basically an approach in which the family of a person with EDs takes control of the eating of the person with an ED and monitors them and supports them. Similar to a way in which it might be done in a residential centre.
http://www.blog.drsarahravin.com/eating-disorders/rethinking-residential-treatment-less-is-more/
This article is quite biased in so far as the author is not in favour of residential treatments for reasons which all seem valid to me. It prefers the Maudsley approach because it allows the person with an ED to get better in the same environment in which they would have had to return to, if they were in a residential setting. The main summary of pros and cons for residential are copied and pasted below:
Residential treatment for eating disorders, as it exists today, has several benefits and several drawbacks. The benefits include:
• Supported nutrition to promote appropriate weight restoration
• Round-the-clock monitoring to prevent patients from engaging in bingeing, purging, restricting, and substance use
• Protection from self-harm and suicide
• Providing the patient with a respite from the stresses of school, work, sports, and everyday life
• Providing the family with a respite from the daily strain of caring for their loved one
The drawbacks to residential treatment, as it exists today, include:
• Prolonged separation from the family and home environment
• Prolonged absence from school, friends, extracurricular activities, and normal routines
• Exposure to other eating disorder patients, which can result in acquisition of new symptoms, solidification of identity as an “eating disorder patient,” and competitiveness with other patients about who is sicker or thinner
• Artificial environment – a “bubble” – which does not translate to real-world living
• Exposure to outdated and unproven theories about the etiology and treatment of eating disorders (e.g., blaming “family dysfunction,” search for “root causes,” exploration of supposed “underlying issues”)
• Failure to plan adequately for a smooth transition home
• Insufficient family involvement (weekly phone sessions and “family weekend” pay lip service to family involvement, but they often play the blame game, focus on presumed family dysfunction, advise parents to “back off” and not be the “food police,” and fail to educate families as to how to help their loved one recover. In essence, many family sessions send all the wrong messages and fail to send the helpful ones).
• Over-diagnosis of and over-medication for supposed comorbid disorders which are largely, if not entirely, the result of malnourishment and / or refeeding
• Attempts to use psychotherapy of any kind on patients who are not able to benefit cognitively or emotionally.
Given relapse rates, even after residential treatment, the Maudsley approach might be ideal (even for adults), if they had such a supportive and willing family. But where this does not exist, then in my opinion, something which is similarly supportive, like residential, is the next best option.
Sorry this was so long. All input welcome.
xx